Thursday, 18 February 2010

Council Meeting

After attending the Southampton Council meeting on Wednesday 17th February at 3.00pm, I found out what happens in the meetings and actually found the set up and debates quite interesting; much to my surprise.

The meeting was about proposed council tax discounts for special constables and persons over the age of 65. This wasn't a particularly interesting subject to talk about but the way in which the councillors argue, jest and provoke each other did make me giggle a couple of times.

I was very happy to see that our Mayor was a woman; Liz Mizon, who is a Liberal Democrat. When the councillors are speaking they always refer to the Mayor as "Madam Mayor". This led me to believe that she ran the meeting. She also called for order a couple of times which makes it a little more clear who runs the meetings.

I'm not completly sure but there were two sides to the council chamber. When a person from one side was speaking they would make a sarcastic comment towards the opposite side; which would have nods and tapping of the desks from their side and moans and groans from the other. This led me to believe that maybe the two sides follow different political parties. The left side had the most people giving speeches, they also made many comments about the dislike of the Conservatives.

In front of the Mayor there was a man and a woman sat next to each other. The lady was taking minutes of the meeting, (I think) and kept time, (I think). There was a little box with a green, amber and red light on that she would switch on when a new councillor would start their speech. The man took the votes and read the rules and proposals out; when he wasn't asleep.

One councillor gave me the most laughs, to demonstrate his points in his speech he had bought in a recycling bag with a spade, some trucks, a box and a couple of other things in. On each item there was a post-it note with different amounts of money on each. Even though this didn't make a lot of sense to me as I wasn't at the last meeting, I did notice that the side opposite to him, the left, did not like what he was talking about. They laughed and called him ridiculous. He got quite angry, red faced and threw in a lot of sarcastic comments towards the side opposite him.

I noticed that there were about 34 men and only about 16 women at the meeting. Even though the number is quite small for the women, this is still more than I thought that there would be at the council meeting.
Overall I found the meeting quite interesting and wouldn't mind going back. Next time however I think I may pick a meeting that talks more about something that concerns me as I am neither a constable or over 65.

Wednesday, 17 February 2010

Mary Wollstonecraft and J.S.Mill

Mary Wollstonecraft is considered one of the very first feminists. However throughout her book and chapter 4, of which we have read, she knows that men and women are not equal and she doesn’t aspire for them to be. Mary says that there are areas of life where they should be equal such as education and morality but not that they should be equal in every part of there lives.

Mary wrote this book to respond to Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Perigord’s 1791 report to the French National Assembly. In his book he stated that women should only receive a domestic education. As Mary’s main love was education, and her thoughts that women should have the same education as men or at least a rational education she was outraged by Charles’s book and as a result, she wrote her own.

Mary starts chapter 4 by saying that women are to “delight man,” she carries on in the same paragraph to say that, “dismissing these fanciful theories, and considering woman as a whole, let it be what it will, instead of part of man.” Thus meaning that she wants women to stand alone, to be there own person. To have their own opinions, thoughts and rational ideas, women should not need men to form their opinions for them. Women should be “companions” for their husbands and not just wives that look after the children and listen to their husbands; but be able to form an opinion on what their husband says.

“Pleasure is the business of woman’s life” and “little can be expected from such weak beings.” In both accounts Mary is writing about women and how they have been made to act. Without education women can have noting expected of them apart from filling their days making themselves look beautiful and spending afternoons at teas with friends whilst their husbands are at work. Mary goes on to say that even this, their only time filling purpose during the day turns against them after a while. “Experience should teach them that the men who pride themselves upon paying this arbitrary insolent respect to the sex, with the most scrupulous exactness are most inclined to tyrannise over, and despise the very weakness they treasure.” Again after referring to the women that their experience should teach them that men are most inclined to tyrannise them and learn to ignore and dislike the weakness women have that once drew the men in to become their husbands. “Adoration comes first, and the scorn is not anticipated.” This is the cycle of a relationship between men and women in the early 18th century, this how women were treated by men.

Mary also says that women, without virtue are their masters and sovereigns. Meaning that women that don’t have virtue on their side and don’t groom themselves all day for men, do not have a man to look after them and treat them like a slave. They are their own masters; they have no man to control them.

Mary refers to Lord Chesterfield at one point and calls him, “the libertine who, in a gust of passion, takes advantage of unsuspecting tenderness.” As women are only on the earth to please men and men having an education know how to exploit the women to get what they want from them. Mary comments, “Women are always on the watch to please,” and says that women are, “only taught to please.” There is no other way for women to act. When their mothers and grandmothers have only tried to please men all their lives and then taught their children to please men, the cycle continues. Yet if women had an education they could pass this on to their children instead of the need to please men and not themselves.

One of Mary’s arguments is, “if woman be allowed to have an immortal soul, she must have, as the employment of life, an understanding to improve” the rest of her argument goes on to end, “she is incited by present gratification to forget her grand destination, nature is counteracted, or she was born only to procreate and rot.” This means that Mary’s argument is either woman has an immortal soul and wants to improve on life through education or woman wants to please men and fulfil their days with leisure, the “procreate and rot.”

Mary also writes about men only aiming to do the best in their career and then taking a wife to look after him and give him what he wants whereas a woman’s first and only aim is to find a man in a higher class and please him so well he agrees to marry her. She then procreates and dies. This is her life’s work.

Mary quotes Rousseau which helps her reach her exact point, to the whole of the book that she has written. The quote she uses from Rousseau is, “educate women like men, and the more they resemble our sex the less power they will have over us.” Mary continues with, “This is the very point I aim at. I do not wish them to have power over men; but over themselves.” This is the point that Mary is forever reaching for and trying to show the women. They can have power over themselves; they don’t have to be termed, “the sweet flowers that smile in the walk of man” but be the sovereigns of themselves. They do not need to please men but please themselves like a libertarian. Men only live to please themselves, no one else. They strive to be the best that they can be, not strive to please others the best that he can.

John Stuart Mill on Liberty – Introduction

Mill says that there are three types of Liberty. They are:
The Liberty of expressing and publishing opinions - This falls under a different principle, since it is written by an individual but concerns many people, Mills says, “being of as much importance as the Liberty of thought itself, and resting in great part on the same reasons.”
Liberty of tastes and pursuits – this is the individual doing exactly what they want to do, however they would like to do it. However it must not hurt anyone else.
The Liberty of each individual – the individuals joining together to follow the liberty. However they must be of the correct age and not forced or deceived into following.
Mill says that “no society in which these liberties are not, on the whole, respected is free.”
Mill also says that the only way for any individual to be truly free is to pursue, “our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impede their efforts to obtain it.” So the individual has to follow their own route of happiness and then they will be truly free. However in the cause of finding their own liberty they must not impede anyone else that is on their own route to freedom.

Mill also agrees that there has to be a government to defend our country and to punish people that do wrong and harm others. He states, “it was needful that there should be an animal of prey stronger than the rest, commissioned to keep them down.” However this means that this one person or group such as a government or King is always fighting to keep their power or gain it if they do not have it. Even if the power is limited.

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

FOI Requests Make Front Page News

Yet again I read The Sun yesterday and felt a little guilty for finding some articles actually quite interesting. News is news after all isn't it? Well just like my last post I found this article interesting because the way in which they gained their knowledge. This was again, through a Freedom of Information Request.

The Sun wanted to know about 'primary school mums'. They requested information and they received astonishing figures of how many girls get pregnant every year and their ages. The article said that there are 23 girls under 15 expecting children every day. It also said that 15 girls that are aged 10 have given birth over the last 7 years. These figures are massive and are not ending.

This news was not over the front page, it was given a small corner but the front page is best no matter how small right? This started to make me think. The Sun has written two very interesting articles about society and both times have gained their knowledge from Freedom of Information Requests.

I have now decided that I want to submit my own request. The direct.gov website tells you how to apply for the requests, who you can apply to, what you should and should not write and all the details that go along with the act that you need to consider. All I have to do now is to think of what I would like to request and write the letter. I will, ofcourse keep you posted on my blog of the question I choose to send and the company I choose to send it to. If anyone has any ideas please let me know as it's taking me a while to think of a good question. I will then hopefully have information to write an article on.

Well, good luck to me and I'll keep you guys posted.

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/Yourrightsandresponsibilities/DG_4003239

Thursday, 21 January 2010

Exam Scam and Law!

After reading the beloved Sun newspaper, I came across an article that took my fancy. As I am a student and have to take the dreaded exams after months of study, revision and worry I was shocked to see the amount of students that cheat...and dont get away with it. The way in which they try to cheat I found were quite creative however. Much better than any of my ideas.
They included, hiding the answers in the toilets and then taking a toilet break to revise the answers. Writing on skin and body parts, buying coursework from better students and from the Internet, stealing a memory stick from another student and passing it off as their own work and having a 'stand-in' take the exam for them. The latter I thought was the most interesting, not even turning up for the exam yourself. You could be out shopping with friends whilst the rest of your class sit in the exam. Being reassured that someone is in your seat and giving better answers than you could have yourself.
I was also quite happy to find that Winchester didn't make the list of the cheating students. The worst University was Teeside University in Middlesbrough, (17 students caught) Middlesex University expelled 15 students and Kingston University expelled 10. Either us Winch students know the answers or we're better at not being caught.
However what made me want to blog about this article was not the ways in which to cheat or the Universities that the culprits attend but the way in which The Sun came about the information. The paper actually showed that it can perform good journalism.
We learnt about this last semester. It was the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This makes information accessible to anyone from any company, when asked for. The Sun wrote, "we submitted a Freedom of Information request to discover the most popular ways of cheating - and which campuses had the most culprits."
So as you can see The Sun does have some rare moments of journalism but, they are rare glimpses. I found, just a page over from this article a strory about Celebrity Big Brother. I found 3 spelling mistakes and 2 punctuation problems. Happy Reading fellow Bloggers.

Monday, 14 December 2009

Law: Inside and Out

I thought that I would post an entire blog devoted to my revision cards on Law. If I have anything wrong please let me know. Also they may be helpful for other people too. I have all ready written a blog on definitions so I'll try not to repeat myself. In this blog I am hoping to address the key points of the most important parts of Journalism Law to study.

LIBEL
Libel is, a three point list, any of these may be done. They are: 1. defmamation - publish something about someone that defames them or slander. 2. identification - a particualr person is named, pictured or with jigsaw identification - put the facts out but when reading the article or watching the broadcast you can put together the facts and identify the one person. 3. Publication - this means that is going out to more than one person. If it is publicated on the internet, each time the site is viewed it is publicated again.

There are three defences for this. You only have to have one, although more would help your cause if you were ever in this position. 1. Justification - it is true and you can prove it. 2. Comment - It is in your opinion as the writer that what you have written is your opinion and not a fact. On the page of your article you must have comment or opinion. This was you can not be sued, with a reader presuming your opinion is a fact. 3. Qualified Privilege - this is when the comment has been said in court. If you are going to report on this it must be fair, fast and accurate. * The offended person doesn't have to show that they have been harmed but they do have to show that they have suffered.

COMMON LAW QUALIFIED PRIVILEGE
There is another form of qualified privilege which is, Common Law Qualified Privilege. This came about by the Clegg Case. I will provide links at the bottom so you can go into each case in more detail than what I am providing. The Clegg case is a soldier that stopped some drunken youths from driving in Northern Ireland. They gave him abuse and so he shot them thinking that they were terrorists. The 'Free Clegg Campaign' said that the solicitors prosecuting him were the IRA. This defamed the solicitors and so they sued the campaign group. Surprisingly the campaign group won. They won because the comment was made in a public meeting. It was publicated to a third party but it wasn't malice, it arose in a public meeting. There is also freedom of expression within this case. This is Common Law Qualified Privilege (CLQP).

The points for it be understood as CLQP are: 1. it is so important that the public need to hear about it. Whether you can prove it or not. 2. it has to be without malice, including everything you have ever written before.3. the facts must be accurate. Also, as an added extra there must be reasonable suspicion.
DEFAMATION
There is another 3 point list, however i think that you only need to have one of the following points to make it defamatory, not all of them, the same with the 3 point list for libel. They are: 1. the article/broadcast could expose someone to ridicule, contempt or hatred. 2. cause them to be shunned or avoided. 3. demeaning in their profession. The plaintiff has one year to gather their evidence, KEEP ALL YOUR NOTES for a minimum of this time.

CONFIDENTIALITY
If you are committing breach of contract you will be ticking these boxes: 1. quality of confidence, not just tittle tattle 2. it is imparted in circumstances implying confidentiality. 3. you will need authorisation to use it or you will be committing detriment - they must prove that they have been hurt by it. A case that fits in well is the Graham Pink case. He was nurse that worked for the NHS. He spoke to a newspaper but because of the gagging clause in his job contract he was fired. This was a breach of his contract and the NHS' confidentiality.

REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE ACT
This governs the way the elections are held. When broadcasting the channel must give equal air time to all parties over an amount of time. Yes this means allowing the BNP on the television too.
COPYRIGHT
We (journalists) exploit the law of copyright - it has to be news to be sold and it has to original to be copyrighted.

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
(FOIA) This is the right to obtain documents from companies. Simply phone the company and they must send you the relevant information that you have asked for.

PRIVACY - Article 8
Every person has the right to a normal family life. With privacy the best case to use would be Princess Carolina. The judge ruled that journalists cant take pictures of anyone unless they are given permission or if the person is doing a clear public duty. There are two types of consent: 1. you have to have explicit consent. This is written consent by the person in picture. 2. implicit consent - the area is likely to filmed or pictured. For example a live football match. There will definitely be cameras here. For an added point it is quite good to get the person to look into the camera. This way it will be shown on your rushes that they knew that the camera was there and that they were being filmed. If you film someone and they don't know this could be classed as subterfuge.

Subterfuge is when you are not honest. A journalist should always be upfront and tell the interviewee who they are, who they write for and their job. If this isn't done the person could sue. Rushes that are not known about by the interviewee will not be able to be used in court.

When on private land it isn't trespassing unless you have forced your way on to the grounds. There can also be no forced used when trying to escort you from the premises unless they think that you are going to commit a crime. This is thanks to the Tony Martin Law. The Tony Martin Law came about after the farmer with this name shot at two burglars that he found in his house. He was sentenced for man-slaughter after one of them men died of a shot in his back and the other was shot in the leg; he however only got sentenced a few years and recovered well.

Another case that can be used for privacy is the Max Mosley case. The News of The World reported that he had an orgy with 5 girls in a Nazi fashion. Interestingly he is the son of Oswald Mosley who marched with the black shirts to a Jewish part of town in London and started a fight just before the second World War. Mosley took NOTW to court and won. The judge said that he won because the activities he took part in did not involve Nazi role play.

TEN POINT LIST
Lord Nicholls set down a listof pointers to publications indicating what courts would look at to decide if the defence could be claimed. The courts will also examine whether the defendant can claim to have engaged in "responsible journalism" and "neutral reportage". Libel can be a criminal offence as well as a civil wrong. The ten point list is: 1.it must be a serious matter, the more serious the matter the more protected you will be. 2. the nature of the information - if it is likely to be said in court, even if it is defamatory and not malicious. 3. the source of the information, it has to be a solid source. 4. you must be able to show that you have taken steps to check and dissprove it. 5. the status of the information must be important and printed as soon as posisble. Not on a slow news day. 6. did you give them a chance to deny it? The final phonecall - allow them to say "no comment". 7. whether the article has the summary of the final phonecall. 8. the tone of the article. 9. the circumstances of the publication. 10. everything must be accurate, precise and facts. Cases that go well with the ten point list are the Galloway case and the Jamil case.

MAGISTRATES COURTS
Family disputes are handled here. All crimes have to go through a magistrates court, they will either deal with it themselves or pass it on to the crown courts. Non-indictable - minor fines - summary justice - parking tickets and Either-way - breaking and entering.

CROWN COURT
If the sentence can be 5 years or over - indictable offences (very offensive). Cases get referred here from the Magistrates Court. Between Magistrates and Crown court they will be released on bail or on rimand if there is fear of them absconding.

I hope that I have been of some help and that it's not all wrong. Good Luck for the test.
Sites to view the cases mentioned in more detail.

Friday, 11 December 2009

Brave Student Hauls Elderly Man to Safety

A student pulled an elderly man to safety as a fire blazed below them in Winchester.

An ambulance crew arrived to find a student, Edward Herbert sat with the old man by the window as the fire raged below them.

After climbing the ladder, Herbert found the elderly man and pulled him to an open window; to breathe more easily. 

Herbert, reassured the 84-year-old, "telling him it was OK".

As the fire blazed from the kitchen on the floor below, Herbert did all he could to keep him alive. Herbert said, "he fainted twice on me", "it was really scary, I thought the worst"

After surviving the blaze with the elderly man Herbert added, "I just wanted to get him out". 

The brave 20-year-old plans to visit the elderly man in Winchester hospital this week, where he resides "feeling fine" with his family.

The fire is thought to have started by an electrical appliance in the kitchen.

It is thanks to the fire alarm that the elderly mans neighbors realised there was a fire at all. 

The fire alarm is also the reason for young Edward Herbert to climb into the elders house and pull him to safety; where the Hampshire fire and ambulance crew took over.

News class example

Friday, 4 December 2009

Isn't it Ironic? Or is it?

Recently there have been quite an amount of events that at the time I have called ironic. However it is thanks to these events that I have wondered what "ironic" truly means. Or if I am using it in compeltely the wrong sense of the word.

To begin with, my first thought was of the song "Isn't it ironic" by Alanis Morisette. The very first line is, "an old man turned ninety-eight he won the lottery and died the next day". Is that ironic? Or is it, "rain on your wedding day"? Is this ironic? I would just say that it is bad luck. Especially if you have planned a garden party.

I'm also confused between an event being ironic or a miracle. If you're wondering around late at night wondering about God and then some church bells ring is that ironic or is it a miracle, or is it none of the above and something completely different.

Wikipedia, my beloved friend, defines irony as, "a situation, literary technique or rhetorical device, in which there is an incongruity, discordance or unintended connection that goes beyond the most evident meaning. It is the expression of one's meaning by using language that normally signifies the opposite. And to the normal person, in English, wikipedia is saying that irony is when the use of language signifies the opposite. When you dress for a summers day in August and it snows. Unlikely yes, however is that also what irony is? An event that is unlikely to happen.

The free online dictionary says that, ironic is split into three meanings. 1 being, characterized by or constituting irony (do you not therefore need irony defined?) 2, given to the use of irony and 3,poignantly contrary to what was expected or intended. So there we have it, if an event is ironic it is the exact opposite to what was expected. So if I went on holiday to Alaska, with my suit case packed full of mittens, boots and jumpers it would be ironic if when i got there the polar bears were sunbathing and swimming due to the heat. This would be ironic as it would not be what I was to expect.

Just encase you wanted to know, the free online dictionary defines irony as the use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning. So irony is just in terms of literacy.